Divorce and custody rulings
Legal Knowledge: extreme bias. allows all rulings to be written by local counsel. ignores child support formulas. punishes protective parent
Fairness & Impartiality: Bias towards protective parent. supports Fathers who are convicted felons with documented history of DV and abuse of children.
Judicial Temperament: Punishes children if they don’t follow dad’s narrative telling them they will be put in foster care. raises his voice at children under 8. Jails Moms for contempt without legal basis if they respectfully offer evidence that reveals Dad’s patterns of coercive control.
Communication: takes 60 plus days to issue written orders following hearings. issues vague and contradictory orders which favor abusive parent allowing them to insert their interpretation.
Timeliness: allows money parent to use excessive filings to delay hearings, jurisdiction transfers. 60 days to issue written orders after hearings to delay in favor of money parent.
★★☆☆☆Anonymous reviewer
required me to turn over medical records in order to see my children. My children are now estranged of three years, did not recuse himself when plantiffs city county commissioner sister in law swayed him by authoritative prescence and obvious solidarity for plaintiff, great grandmother in law waved and winked at judge prior to ultimately getting a start to hearing my case. Heard none of my valid concerns.
★☆☆☆☆Member of the public
C
Legal Knowledge: lots of fabrications through Cps records not acknowledged no due process Allowed a petitioner no legal standing on a epo granted temp custody to while documents filed in court to request removal due to allegations of child abuse accepted against Petitioner delaying a removal of a wk Risking a Childs Safety no legal standing
Communication: poor